<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worms and Viruses Solution</title>
	<link>http://www.funbie.com/blog/66/worms-and-viruses-solution/</link>
	<description>Khushal's thoughts, n00bery and geekery~</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: sakw</title>
		<link>http://www.funbie.com/blog/66/worms-and-viruses-solution/#comment-3922</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.funbie.com/blog/66/worms-and-viruses-solution/#comment-3922</guid>
					<description>Good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hissam Amir</title>
		<link>http://www.funbie.com/blog/66/worms-and-viruses-solution/#comment-702</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.funbie.com/blog/66/worms-and-viruses-solution/#comment-702</guid>
					<description>Em u r right but the most important thing to realise is that is the antivirus effective in removing the virus it detects? Now AntiVIRE is good at detecting but still it does not gives you that much satisfaction as compared to Nortron and this I am telling from my personal use...ANTIVIRE was good but in the end i had regestration problems and it got slower...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Em u r right but the most important thing to realise is that is the antivirus effective in removing the virus it detects? Now AntiVIRE is good at detecting but still it does not gives you that much satisfaction as compared to Nortron and this I am telling from my personal use...ANTIVIRE was good but in the end i had regestration problems and it got slower...
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: fauxy</title>
		<link>http://www.funbie.com/blog/66/worms-and-viruses-solution/#comment-448</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.funbie.com/blog/66/worms-and-viruses-solution/#comment-448</guid>
					<description>dexter: your reply shows an innate lack of understanding of the way virus coders work.  using the MOST POPULAR virus scanners is a good way to still get infected, i mean it's not difficult to actually look in memory and see they're running.  lots of the newer crap actually infects and disables popular scanners as a first step.

so using what everyone uses is about as useful as following lemmings into the ocean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dexter: your reply shows an innate lack of understanding of the way virus coders work.  using the MOST POPULAR virus scanners is a good way to still get infected, i mean it's not difficult to actually look in memory and see they're running.  lots of the newer crap actually infects and disables popular scanners as a first step.</p>
<p>so using what everyone uses is about as useful as following lemmings into the ocean.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DeXter^AJ^.</title>
		<link>http://www.funbie.com/blog/66/worms-and-viruses-solution/#comment-166</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 11:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.funbie.com/blog/66/worms-and-viruses-solution/#comment-166</guid>
					<description>AntiVir is a good antivirus but its not very effective against some viruses.And you dont get a regestration crack for it too.Becouse it si not very much recognised. I believe that Nortron 2004 or Macfee Anti virus is the best if and only if you have a powerful system...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AntiVir is a good antivirus but its not very effective against some viruses.And you dont get a regestration crack for it too.Becouse it si not very much recognised. I believe that Nortron 2004 or Macfee Anti virus is the best if and only if you have a powerful system...
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
